OwlBrief

Stay informed, stay wise!

OwlBrief distills the world’s top news into fast, AI-crafted briefs. Stay informed, save time, and get smarter — before your coffee gets cold.

Create account Log in
#International Affairs
UN News
UN News
10h ago 2 views

Russia using ‘rule of fear’ to silence anti-war dissent, says UN independent human rights expert

Russia's use of national security laws to suppress anti-war dissent has intensified, with thousands imprisoned on politically motivated charges. This matters as it highlights the erosion of human rights and civic freedoms in Russia amid the Ukraine conflict.
Russia using ‘rule of fear’ to silence anti-war dissent, says UN independent human rights expert
A What happened
Mariana Katzarova, the UN independent expert on human rights in Russia, has raised serious concerns about the increasing repression of anti-war dissent in the country. Her report to the UN General Assembly reveals that since the onset of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, treason prosecutions have skyrocketed, with over 760 verdicts issued by mid-2025. Espionage laws have been broadened, leading to a significant rise in cases, often combined with terrorism charges. The report also documents the systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners, with credible evidence of severe mistreatment. Katzarova emphasizes the urgent need for accountability and the release of politically motivated detainees, highlighting the total impunity enjoyed by perpetrators of human rights abuses in Russia.

Key insights

  • 1

    Surge in treason prosecutions

    Treason verdicts have increased from double digits to over 760 since 2022.

  • 2

    Widespread torture of detainees

    Ukrainian prisoners face systematic torture, including starvation and medical neglect.

  • 3

    Weaponization of laws

    National security laws are used to criminalize dissent and suppress civic space.

Takeaways

The situation in Russia underscores a grave human rights crisis, with the government increasingly targeting dissenters and using legal frameworks to justify repression. International action is necessary to address these abuses and support those at risk.